1. BACKGROUND
Having traveled to or having been associated with colleagues who have traveled to most continents, I continue to hear the statement: Dont tell us about air conditioning, no one here uses air conditioning. Its too expensive. However, is important for all of us in the energy community to realize that there is very little air conditioning in 3rd world countries because THEY ARE 3rd WORLD COUNTRIES. But there are considerable structural changes occurring which are finding international sources of financing supporting projects in any country. Already there is becoming a gray area between 3rd world countries and "modern" countries and societies. At the same time, global warming trends are becoming more and more evident.
All of this points towards local professionals who know their countries but who also understand the choices for air conditioning. Local professionals need to be able to offer technical expertise to the new generation of business people and developers who will DEFINITELY require air conditioning in modern buildings in the 21st century. Otherwise, the local professional will be trapped in a 3rd world mentality while all of the young, aggressive businessmen and engineers will be moving towards modern (air conditioned) buildings and facilities. The simple reality is that no 21st century office with computers and hubs and routers can exist without air conditioning; no 21st century factory, with sophisticated robotics and highly trained and motivated people can exist without air conditioning!
In considering the above, it is important to note that the United States government was a "part time" government until the mid 1930s. It was just too hot and humid in Washington D.C. to carry out the business of government except for 6 months out of the year. With reliable and reasonably priced air conditioning systems fully commercialized in the 1930s the U.S. congress was able to convene on a full time basis. Of course, there are many people who may argue that this wasnt necessarily beneficial. But air conditioning, especially in a modern society and certainly in the 221st century, is going to be a way of life.
WORLD ISSUES:
Agreements and ongoing changes to the Montreal Protocol and, in the
United States, the Clean Air Act place the professional in a difficult
situation as regards electric cooling. New restrictions and new equipment
seem to appear every day; and some make obsolete or diminish the most educated
plans of even the best managers or engineers.
What follows is a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of Gas Cooling as it can be framed against electric cooling, current CFC rules, anticipated CFC limitations and the alternative options presented by electric cooling technologies.
2. HISTORY and PERSPECTIVE
Although absorption cooling has been used on a widespread commercial
basis since the 1800's and early 1900's, there has been a general reluctance
by commercial and industrial planners to apply gas cooling technologies.
Until recently, a simple comparison of gas vs. electric cooling technologies
looked like this:
Before gas cooling advantages are discussed, the recent complications regarding electric cooling must be fully exposed. The best place to start is with the Montreal Protocol.
3. THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Most facility managers and facility planners know that the Montreal
Protocol exists. In fact, the Montreal Protocol has forever changed the
selection of refrigerants (both in the US, and throughout the world). However,
most of us are not aware of the evolution of this historic agreement as
evidenced by the following table:
Table 2
London Meeting, June 1990
added to the list of controlled compounds: HCFC's Methyl Chloroform,
and Carbon Tetrachloride
Accelerated phase-out of CFC's to 100% by 2,000
Copenhagen Meeting, 11/92
added to the list of controlled compounds methyl bromide
accelerated phase-out of CFC's to 100% by 1996
Accelerated phase-out of HCFC's
Vienna Convention and beyond 11/95
Upheld 2020/2030 phase out dates for HCFC's
Bear in mind that CFC's and HCFC's as "ozone depleting compounds" had left HFC's reasonably free of environmental controversy. However, this changed with the Rio De Janeiro Global Environmental Summit in 1990 and, more recently, with the Kyoto Summit in 1997. At these conferences, global warming issues took center stage.
Because HFC's such as R-134a are said to have significant "Global Warming Potential", and because world agreements for phase out of CFC's and HCFC's have now been formalized, HFC's continue to come under significant environmental analysis.
At the 1995 International Conference on CFC's and Halon Alternatives, for instance, a vocal European contingent pointed out that many European nations do not use HFC-134a as the refrigerant of choice even in their refrigerators because of their concern for global warming.
More recently, specific targets were agreed to by the U.S. and other countries (U.S. global warming targets follows):
U.S. to reduce emission of 6 greenhouse gasses by 7% during the compliance period: 2008 to 2012
Overall, 34 developed nations must collectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2% during the compliance period, including 8% for the European Union and 6% in Japan
6 Gases:
4. THE CLEAN AIR
ACT
Title VI of the U.S.
Clean Air Act is the part of the Clean Air Act that brings the U.S. in
compliance with the World agreements made in the Montreal Protocol. Even
these, requirements, however, are in continuous change. Likewise the paperwork
associated with compliance is significant.
A thorough understanding of Title VI, Sections 608 and 609 of the Clean Air Act involves hundreds of pages of reading and thousands of pages of interpretations. Yet the simple decision to use gas absorption cooling in place of electric cooling results in the ability to completely ignore the Clean Air Act as it relates to refrigerants and ozone depletion.
Until November of 1995, HFC's were exempt from compliance to the Clean Air Act. For this reason, many planners and facility managers chose HFC-134a as the refrigerant of choice for their electric cooling needs (i.e. instead of HCFC-22 or HCFC-123). However, in November of 1995, HFC-134a was no longer exempted from the many rules and issues surrounding refrigerants and the Clean Air Act. Hence, of the only three refrigerants currently available for electric cooling over 150 tons, ALL are under the jurisdiction of Title VI of the Clean Air Act.
Just a few of the significant issues associated with electric cooling as impacted by Title VI of the Clean Air Act include:
This allowable leakage level may be further tightened in the near future. More important than this is the simple fact that ANY and ALL users of CFC, HCFC or HFC based refrigerants MUST keep documentation associated with the leakage rate (and subsequent refrigerant charging) of each and every piece of refrigeration or air conditioning equipment.
Of course, because absorption refrigeration is water based, there is no requirement surrounding leakage or related documentation.
b) Intentional Venting of Refrigerants: Venting of any CFC, HCFC or HFC based refrigerant, in any but a "de minimus" amount is illegal and is subject to prosecution of up to $25,000 per day per violation. In addition, anyone who reports a violation or even a suspected violation of venting will receive a $10,000 reward. This creates a potential adversarial relationship between various service companies and staff and management.
In order to fully appreciate the extent of the paperwork involved in the event of a suspicion of illegal venting, Exhibit A identifies the checklist items that the EPA uses in investigating a suspected venting violation.
c) Recycle Recovery
Equipment (RRE):
During maintenance,
of CFC, HCFC or HFC containing equipment (i.e. any electric cooling equipment,
the Clean Air Act requires that approved and certified RRE equipment be
used to recycle the refrigerant (i.e. to ensure that no venting occurs).
For an example of the complex specifications surrounding Recycle Recovery
Equipment the reader is directed toward a comparison of various models
currently on the market.
In addition to considering the many technical details associated with RRE selection, and in addition to the expense of the equipment, the purchaser and user of recycle recovery equipment must also consider:
All of the currently available refrigerants ARE new; and are "blends" or "zeotropes" or "azeotropes" which are comprised of various HFC's, HCFC's and hydrocarbon (or other) refrigerants or gases. As such, these refrigerants exhibit less stability than those used in the past for conventional electric cooling. Likewise, they require expensive and new synthetic oils called polyol esters. These oils often require additives and special treatment due to their sensitivity to moisture.
Because the new refrigerants are less stable than the phased out refrigerants there are also problems associated with such characteristics as separation and temperature "glide". As you can guess, there are also many management and maintenance issues surrounding any and all of the new refrigerants used for electric cooling.
All mechanical rooms defined and described in ASHRAE 15, 1994 now require mechanical ventilation, refrigerant sensors, at least two Self Contained Breath Apparatus, differing types of multiple sensors, and a plethora of other issues or requirements. Just the analysis relating to ASHRAE 15 requires significant time and promulgates significant confusion relating to the question: "Exactly what IS required based on the type and quantity of CFC, HCFC or HFC refrigerants and the layout of the mechanical room?".
6. PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT
REQUIREMENTS
Because CFC, HCFC
and HFC based refrigerants are complex, environmentally hazards and relatively
expensive, there are now many types of peripherals typical offered by each
of the major manufacturers of electric cooling. Of course, the types of
peripherals can and do vary significantly between manufactures and change
periodically.
The most important piece of peripheral equipment required for Low Pressure chillers is a purge unit. As with other peripheral equipment discussed above, purge units vary significantly from manufacturer to manufacture.
7. SOME ADVANTAGES
OF ABSORPTION COOLING
In addition to the
many issues surrounding electric cooling as cited above, the advantages
of absorption cooling also include:
Significant efficiency improvements: Thanks to renewed interest in gas cooling technologies there have been significant increases in gas cooling efficiencies.
Gas deregulation stability vs. confusion and transition in the electric industry: Gas cooling makes up over 70% of total tonnage in Japan. Electric industry deregulation in the U.S. is only beginning and will not be completed until half way through the first decade of the 21st century. Until that time, the situation regarding availability, price and stability for electricity is in complete contrast to that of natural gas. This adds another degree of instability to the issue of electric cooling.
Peak Power Pricing: Even if electric uncertainly wasn't on the horizon, the simple fact that electric cooling requirements are at their peak when electric cost is at its peak cost results in a vulnerability that any user of electric cooling is exposed to. A way to circumvent the coincident high price of electricity with the high demand for electric cooling has been Thermal Energy Storage (TES). However, when compared to absorption cooling, TES is complex, controls and, at times, maintenance intensive and requires even a LARGER footprint.
Diversity: Coincident with the need for stability in this era of change is a need for diversity. Gas cooling, by itself or combined in a hybrid situation with electric cooling presents the facility manager with the diversity he or she needs to guarantee stability in a changing environment.
Yes, absorption cooling has some disadvantages of size and first cost. However, when compared to this updated Table 2, these problems are relatively simple to resolve. Compare this with the unpredictability of laws, international environmental pressure, peripheral equipment requirements, unstable refrigerants, changing safety and mechanical room issues and the sheer number of emergent refrigerants.
As a result, we find the rather simple and predictable disadvantages of gas cooling compared to complex and unpredictable disadvantages of electric cooling may be summarized like this:
It is a small wonder that Japan, with it's focus on long term solutions, total quality management and profitability has more than half of it's total installed tonnage in absorption cooling. Air conditioning is definitely in your future... no matter what country you work in. But as you are familiarizing yourself with issues of the more conventional electric cooling systems and refrigerants, it will be important to also familiarize yourself with gas cooling technologies.
Electric Cooling
1) Changing Configurations and Performance
2) Changing Requirements of Clean Air Act
3) Maintenance More Complex when including Recycling Equipment and
ASHRAE 15 requirements.
4) Increased and volatile cost of refrigerants
5) Unstable number and type of refrigerants
6) Changing Equipment and Peripherals
7) ASHRAE 34 and ASHRAE 15 Mechanical Room Requirements (and Fire/Safety
Requirmenets Severe and changing
8) Recycle/recovery technologies expensive and difficult to compare
over equipment life.
9) Utility deregulation in a volatile and unpredictable state
10) Global warming issues surrounding the new refrigerants are unpredictable.
Significant environmental pressure against all current "front runner" alternative
refrigerants.